FREUD AND PSYCHOANALYSIS
These notes form only the merest introduction into this topic and you will need
to do further reading around the subject yourself if you are going to gain more
detailed insights into this area of psychology. The aim of this handout is to
clarify the basic principles of Freud’s theories and to raise the main issues.
It is important to be clear about the meanings of certain terms that you may
come across and throughout the handout you will find footnotes clarifying
certain terms. Firstly though, a word about the terms psychoanalysis and
psychodynamics. Psychoanalysis refers to both Freud’s original attempt at
providing a comprehensive theory of the mind and also to the associated
treatment. The term encompasses both Freudian theory and therapy. You will also
come across the term psychodynamics. This term is used to denote the approach
which began with psychoanalysis but which has now broadened into a much more
diverse collection of theories and models developed by other psychologists, all
of which nevertheless retain some of the main ideas of Freud’s original theory.
1.8.1 BACKGROUND
Sigmund Freud was born in 1856 in Moravia, which was then part of the Austrian
Empire and is now in the Czech Republic. He spent most of his life in Vienna,
from where he fled, in 1937, when the Nazis invaded. Neither Freud (being
Jewish) or his theories were very popular with the Nazis and he escaped to
London where he died in 1939.
He had wanted to be a research scientist but anti-Semitism forced him to choose
a medical career instead and he worked in Vienna as a doctor, specialising in
neurological disorders (disorders of the nervous system). He constantly revised
and modified his theories right up until his death but much of his
psychoanalytic theory was produced between 1900 and 1930.
Freud originally attempted to explain the workings of the mind in terms of
physiology and neurology ...(but)... quite early on in his treatment of
patients with neurological disorders, Freud realised that symptoms which had no
organic or bodily basis could imitate the real thing and that they were as real
for the patient as if they had been neurologically caused. So he began to
search for psychological explanations of these symptoms and ways of treating
them.
In 1885 he spent a year in Paris learning hypnosis from the neurologist
Charcot; he then started using hypnosis with his patients in Vienna. However,
he found its effects to be only temporary at best and it did not usually get to
the root of the problem; nor was everybody capable of being hypnotised.
Meanwhile Breuer, another Viennese doctor, was developing another method of
therapy which he called the cathartic method, where patients would talk out
their problems. Freud adopted Breuer’s method and called it free association
which became one of the three fundamental tools of psychoanalysis.
Freud began his self-analysis during the 1890s and in 1900 published The
Interpretation of Dreams, in which he outlined his theory of the mind, followed
by The Psychopathology of Everyday Life (1904), A Case of Hysteria and Three
Essays on the Theory of Sexuality (1905).
Two of Freud’s closest colleagues, Carl Jung and Alfred Adler, helped him form
the psychoanalytic movement and the first International Psychoanalytic Congress
was held in Salzburg in 1908. The Journal of Psychoanalysis was first published
in 1909 and, in that year, Freud and Jung made a lecture tour of the USA. (From
Gross, R (1996) Psychology, The Science of Mind and Behaviour, page 508)
1.8.2 FREUD’S STRUCTURE OF PERSONALITY
Freud compared the human personality to an iceberg. The small part that shows
above the surface of the water represents conscious experience ; the much
larger mass below the water level represents the unconscious - a storehouse of
impulses, passions, and inaccessible memories that affect our thoughts and
behaviour. It is this portion of the mind that Freud sought to explore with the
use of free association.
Freud also believed that personality was composed of three major systems: the
id, the ego and the superego. Each system has its own functions but the three
interact to govern behaviour.
(a) The id
The id is the most primitive part of the personality and the first to develop.
It is present in the newborn infant. It is located in the unconscious and it is
from the id that the ego and the superego later develop.
The id consists of the basic biological impulses (or drives): the need to eat,
drink, eliminate wastes, avoid pain and gain sexual pleasure. Freud also
believed that aggression was a basic biological drive.
The id seeks immediate gratification of these impulses. Like a young child, the
id operates on the pleasure principle : it endeavours to avoid pain and obtain
pleasure regardless of the external circumstances.
(b) The ego
As the child develops it learns that their impulses cannot always be
immediately gratified. Some must be delayed (for example, hunger must wait
until someone provides food) and some (for example, hitting someone) may be
punished.
A new part of the personality, the ego, develops as the young child learns to
consider the demands of reality. The ego constitutes our conscious self and
obeys the reality principle : It is essentially the part of personality that
decides what actions are appropriate and which id impulses will be satisfied in
what manner. The ego mediates among the demands of the id, the realities of the
world and the demands of the superego.
(c) The superego
The superego, is the internalised representation of the values and morals of
society as taught to the child by the parents and others. It is essentially the
individuals conscience. The superego decides whether an action is right or
wrong. Initially, parents control a child’s behaviour directly by reward and
punishment. Through the incorporation of parental standards into the superego,
behaviour is brought under self-control. The superego develops in response to
parental rewards and punishments.
In summary, the id seeks pleasure, the ego tests reality and mediates, the
superego constrains and strives for perfection. Not surprisingly, the three
components of personality are in constant conflict: the ego postpones the
gratification the id wants immediately and the superego battles with both
because behaviour often falls short of the moral code it represents.
1.8.3 MANAGING THE CONFLICT
In order to deal with this conflict, the ego develops a series of defence
mechanisms which allow it to protect itself from the pressures of the id, the
real world and the superego. Examples are:
Repression - burying a memory so thoroughly that it is not recalled at all -
“it never happened”.
Projection - attributing own unwanted “bad” feelings or ideas to another
person.
Rationalisation - making up a reasonable excuse for unacceptable behaviour and
really believing it.
Suppression - forgetting a shocking event on purpose: (consciously in this
case) putting it out of one’s mind.
Denial - refusing to acknowledge something because it is so distressing.
Displacement - transferring feelings from one person or object to another.
Identification - imitating someone who is admired and modelling oneself on
them.
Reaction-Formation - consciously substituting the opposite emotion for true
feelings about someone/something.
Freud believed that conflict is inevitable and all behaviour is a compromise.
Conflict is the primary cause of human anxiety and unhappiness. Defence
mechanisms are one way we have of dealing with our inner conflict; neurotic
symptoms and dreaming are the other major forms of compromise.
1.8.4 THE DEVELOPMENT OF PERSONALITY
Freud believed that the individual, during the first five years of life,
progresses through several developmental stages that affect personality.
Applying a broad definition of sexuality, he called these periods psychosexual
stages. During each stage, the pleasure-seeking impulses of the id focus on,
and derive pleasure from, a particular area of the body and on activities
connected with that area.
Freud called the first year of life the oral stage of psychosexual development.
During this period, infants derive pleasure from nursing and sucking; in fact,
they will put anything they can reach into their mouth.
During the second year of life, the anal stage, as children have their first
experience with imposed control in the form of their toilet training.
In the phallic stage, from about age 3 to age 6, children focus on their
genitals. They observe the differences between males and females and may direct
their awakening sexual impulses toward the parent of the opposite sex. It is at
this stage that children have to resolve the Oedipus and Electra complexes.
A latency period follows the end of the phallic stage, during which children
become less concerned with their bodies and turn their attention to the skills
needed for coping with the environment.
The last stage, the genital stage, occurs during adolescence, during which
young people begin to turn their sexual interests toward others and to love in
a more mature way.
Freud felt that special problems at any stage could arrest (or fixate)
development and have a lasting effect on the individual’s personality. The
libido would remain attached to the activities appropriate for that stage. Thus
a person who was weaned very early and did not have enough sucking pleasure
might become fixated at the oral stage. As an adult, this person may be
excessively dependent on others and overly fond of such oral pleasures as
eating, drinking and smoking. Such a person is called an “oral” personality.
The person fixated at the anal stage of psychosexual development may be
abnormally concerned with cleanliness, orderliness, and saving.
1.8.5 MODIFICATIONS OF FREUD’S THEORIES
Later psychoanalysts felt that Freud placed too much emphasis on the
instinctive and biological aspects of personality and failed to recognise that
people are products of the society in which they live. The neo-Freudians
including Alfred Adler, Erich Fromm, Karen Horney, Carl Jung and Harry Stack
Sullivan, considered personality to be shaped more by the people, society, and
culture surrounding the individual than by biological needs. They placed less
emphasis on the controlling power of the unconscious, believing that people are
more rational in their planing and decisions than Freud thought.
1.8.6 PSYCHOANALYTIC THERAPY
The aim of psychoanalytic therapy is to bring about a fundamental change in the
patient’s personality so that he is released from his neurotic disorders. Freud
believed that neurosis was caused by the repression of disturbing feelings and
emotions associated with conflicts established in early childhood. These
conflicts result from the impulses of the id or the strictures of an over
demanding superego. He assumed that the patient’s ego was too weak to cope with
such conflicts and defended itself by repressing them into the unconscious.
However, conflicts do not go away; they find expression through the symptoms
and neurotic behaviour of the patients. The aims of psychoanalysis are to
remove the infantile conflict from the unconscious and help the patient deal
with it at a conscious level.
Psychoanalytic therapy normally has two stages:
1. the release of repression, thereby allowing the conflict to enter
consciousness, and,
2. the redirection of the emotional energy (libido) associated with the
repression thereby allowing the patient's ego to gain control of the conflict.
Freud developed various techniques for getting round the controlling forces of
the defence mechanisms to reveal the unconscious material which is trying to
gain expression. One of the original methods employed by Freud was hypnosis,
but as has already been mentioned, he found this technique unsatisfactory and
soon began using free association. Later Carl Jung, one of Freud’s students
developed a similar technique known as word association , and both methods are
still widely used in present-day psychoanalysis.
Another technique for getting at unconscious material is the interpretation of
dreams . Another route into the unconscious is via the errors of everyday life,
so-called Freudian slips.
Present day psychoanalysts also regard certain physiological cues such as
posture, blushing or pallor and changes in the timbre of the patient’s voice as
important expressions of unconscious motives and feelings.
1.8.7 AN EVALUATION OF THE PSYCHOANALYTIC APPROACH
Psychoanalytic theory has had an enormous impact on psychological and
philosophical conceptions of human nature. Freud’s major contributions are his
recognition that unconscious needs and conflicts motivate much of out behaviour
and his emphasis on the importance of early childhood experiences in
personality development. His emphasis on sexual factors led to an awareness of
their role in adjustment problems. But Freud made his observations during the
Victorian period when sexual standards were very strict; so it is
understandable that many of his patient’s conflicts centred on their sexual
desires. Today, feelings of guilt about sex are much less frequent, yet the
incidence of mental illness remains about the same. Sexual conflicts are not
the only cause of personality disturbances - and may not even be a major cause.
Some critics also point out that Freud’s theory of personality is based almost
entirely on his observations of emotionally disturbed patients and may not be
an appropriate of the normal, healthy personality. In addition, many of Freud’s
ideas were decidedly sexist. For example, his theory that female psychosexual
development is shaped by “penis envy” and feelings of unworthiness due to the
lack of such equipment is certainly inadequate in view of our current awareness
of the role that social factors play in gender identification. It was probably
not her brother’s penis that a little girl during the Victorian era envied but
his greater independence power and social status.
Although psychoanalysis has exerted a powerful influence on our thinking about
human nature, it has been seriously questioned as a scientific theory.
Freud’s constructs are ambiguous and difficult to define. He does not specify,
for example, what behaviours indicate that a child is fixated at the anal stage
of psychosexual development and what behaviours indicate that he or she is not
fixated. For any body of theory to be accepted as a valid scientific
perspective, its consequences must be statable. The hypothesis that fixation at
the anal stage can lead to stinginess (or to the opposite, generosity) is
evidently not refutable; whatever the outcome, the theory can account for it.
To that extent the psychoanalytic approach fails to meet the criteria of a
scientific theory.
Because some important aspects of psychoanalytic theory cannot be proven
experimentally, some psychologists claim that it has no value either as
psychology or as science (Eysenck 1972). However, many others claim that experimental
validity is an inappropriate yardstick for evaluating psychodynamic theory and
that the theory is verified in practice in the analyst-patient interview.