|
|
|
|
Online Music Sharing
Will cds and cassettes soon become extinct like the 8 track and vinyl records?
Well, that very well may become the case due to online music sharing. Music
sharing has become the hottest, most popular thing now-a-days for teens and
college students across the nation. This innovative idea is now caught in
between a war of advocates and anti-advocates, courts have now become involved,
which side are you on?
I don’t know about you but I’m all for the online music sharing. I’m for it
simply because I am one who doesn’t have a lot of time to go review and listen
to cd’s to hear their potential. I am a very busy person, and I am always on
the run so I don’t have the time to go to the record store and buy whole cd’s
or the singles which is one of the pros of online music sharing.
Online sharing is an excellent way to preview music before one would decide to
buy it because if there aren’t any songs that aren’t liked by the listener then
they would decide to buy the single and not waste money buying a whole album of
an artist that they wouldn’t like. But that factor is frowned upon by the music
industry. Why? One may ask. Because of online music sharing services such as
Napster.
Napster was started by accident by a college student trying to find a faster
way to load and copy songs off of the internet. He some way found out how to
load songs really fast. After finding out this information he put it on the
internet so that other college students like himself who wanted to sample music
could find it faster and easier just like he did.
The Napster website is simply a free way of obtaining the songs wanted and to
make mixed cd’s for themselves and others. There are other sites (i.e.
Morpheus, Aimster, Audio Galaxy) that offer their free music and sites to
listen to any song of their choice. “Currently the post-Napster tool of choice
is Aimster. The name Aimster was cobbled from America Online Instant Messenger
and Napster. Developed by John Deep of Troy, New York, Aimster software allows
AIM users to offer other AIM users a way to locate and copy files on one
another’s computers. Unlike Napster, AIM users are on one another’s buddy lists.
The index of files exists on each AIM user’s personal computer. When one AIM
user wants to copy a file from a “buddy’s” computer, the transfer takes place
between the two machines. Aimster has a search function that prowls the
directory of the buddies’ computers. When it locates the desired file, the
transfer takes place. The speed of the transfer depends on the bandwidth
available to the machines. Otherwise, the request and transfer are almost
instantaneous. Aimster uses ICQ, a popular messaging client, and AOL’s Instant
Messenger to detect buddies. In order to prevent an Aimster-type of
search-and-retrieve function from working, changes in the architecture of these
programs would have to occur or Aimster users would have to be denied access to
these popular services.” (Arnold 1). With all the controversy going on, popular
music artists as well have stood up to voice their opinions and stand against
Napster.
Online music sites have proven to be helpful to many and if they were so wrong
then why are there so many available to the public and free of charge? Why are
a large majority of people using it? “It's one of the gutsiest venture capital
investments ever. Napster, the file-sharing software company at the center of
one of the Net's biggest controversies, had no revenue but needed millions in
private equity. Despite Napster's overnight rise to fame and its potential to
revolutionize the distribution of music, many VCs felt they couldn't get
comfortable backing the startup. Then Hummer Winblad stepped in. In May, the
San Francisco-based firm led a $15 million round of funding--including $13
million of its own--and installed partner Hank Barry as Napster's acting CEO
and John Hummer as a board director. Barry aims to turn Napster into a
subscription service, eliminating the record companies' chief grievance with
Napster: that its technology allows millions to share recorded music for free”
(Park 1).
People like me aren’t stealing the songs, we’re simply getting the songs that
we’ve always wanted from a ‘friend.’ Tell me, what’s the difference between
getting the songs and albums off the internet than getting them from a local
friend of yours? It’s basically the same things except that it’s on a more
world wide type of sharing basis. People have been doing it for years when they
used to (and some still do) dub cassette tapes. The industry didn’t have a
problem with it then, so why a problem with it now? It was out there just not
as prevalent as it is now. I don’t agree with the record industry at all, why
make and place music on material that they know can be copied on MP3s, other
tapes, other cds? “Napster, the digital music distribution service, has been
temporarily shut down. A San Francisco judge ruled the service was encouraging
“wholesale infringing” of record industry copyrights. The Recording Industry
Association of America (RIAA), a trade body that represents record companies
such as Warner and BMG, sued Napster in December accusing it of encouraging the
illegal distribution of MP3s. The RIAA estimates that song swapping via Napster
has cost the music industry more than $300 million in lost sales. For it’s
part, Napster has denied this, saying it’s a community service which encourages
the sharing of music for non-commercial purposes. Independent research from
Jupiter Communications also showed that Napster encourages music sales. While
this ruling is a major blow, it’s by no means a fatal wound. It seems likely
the music industry will eventually embrace Napster.” (Internet Magazine 1).
It’s their fault and they should have to live with the mistakes they made.
Don’t go blaming the innocent people that have found a new way to get around
their system before they did and now they’re upset. They’ve had control for
years, they control the prices of the cds (many of which are just plain
ridiculous), how many quantities are produced, what will be soon out of print,
and so many other things.
It’s about time that we the people took control of a small aspect of it and
since we developed it, we should be allowed to use it and not be punished for
it. And the online music sharing companies should go unpunished as well. Did
they really do anything wrong? They’re honestly giving the people what they
want, none of those artists are truly losing a great heap of money, they’re
just money hungry and want more of it. Well, we’re not rich, we’re regular
Joe’s and we buy, get, and take what we can afford and free…everyone can
afford.
Works Cited
Arnold, Steve. “Peer-to-Peer Computing and Contents Control.” Oct. 2001. pg.1
“Bad News for Online Music.” Internet Magazine. 24 Sep. 2001: pg. 1
Park, Lark. “Keeping the Napster Faith.” 16 Oct. 2000: pg.1