|
|
|
|
|
|
||
History2
Contents
Page
|
||
Matthew Terhune
#302899169
1/30/02
Fussell believes that the soldier of world war two, "suffers so deeply
from contempt and damage to his selfhood, from absurdity and boredom and
chickenshit, that some anodyne is necessary", and that the anodyne of
choice was alcohol. I would argue that Fussell is correct, especially regarding
the connection between the absurdity of the war and the associated damage to
soldiers image of themselves as good and patriotic, and the use of alcohol to
block out the reality of the war. I think this connection is evident in the
interviews presented in Terkel’s "The Good War", especially those of
John Garcia and Eddie Costello.
John Garcia’s sense of the absurdity of the war is particularly keen. It is
first evident to him in a request to board a battleship with fires near the
ammunition. He refuses, but escapes punishment because of his role in rescuing
people from the water. This same value for human life and knowledge of the
futility with which it was often lost in the war pervades his story. He
recounts a man being killed by friendly fire after lighting a cigarette, the
death of his girlfriend from American artillery shells fired at planes, and the
Japanese woman and child he shot in the pacific. John is eager to fight in the
war at first, taking a cut in wages and even petitioning the president to be
allowed to serve. This patriotism is replaced by a sense of guilt and fear once
he must actually kill people. He thinks he committed murder when he shot the
Japanese woman and child, and is haunted by the grief of the families of the
soldiers he kills. He says he drank because it was the only way he could
overcome the guilt and kill someone. Once the war was over he no longer needed
alcohol and stopped drinking, but a permanent change in his view of himself and
warfare is evident. He is still continually troubled in his dreams by the woman
and child he shot, and while he was initially eager to join the war, he refused
to use violence as a policeman afterwards and thinks that if countries are
going to war they ought to send the politicians to fight.
Eddie Costello’s current view of the war is as a "sore asshole", but
he says he started out as a "seventeen year old adolescent patriot".
Eddies experience is similar to Johns in that he initially went to great
lengths to participate in the war, lying about his age to get a munitions
factory job at only 14. After he goes through actual combat, the same absurdity
becomes evident. He bombs Frankfurt as second pilot since the actual second
pilot is too hung over to do it, even though he was also drinking frequently
and had no idea what was going on. When he returned later to the sight, he
found it haunting, and later learned he was bombing it while a German woman who
would later become his friend was present. He doesn’t give many specific
details about his experience, stating, "I’d rather forget about the war,
except when I’m at a cocktail party", but a change in his is evident. He
describes himself at 18, "When I was 18 I was gung-ho, completely a
creature of my countries propaganda machine. There was right and there was
wrong, and I wore the white hat." He makes it through the experience with
the aid of drink, but comes out bitter and Jaded.
bibliography:
"The Good War", Studs Terkel, c.1984, published in the united states
by The New Press, New York, distributed by W.W. Norton & Company, inc., New
York